Technologies
-> Diesel Particulate
Filters -> NO2 from passive filters
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Emissions
Diesel engines emit oxides of nitrogen (NOx),
consisting of nitrogen oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide
(NO2). The percentage of each does vary,
but typically NO2 might make up 10% of
the total NOx coming out of the engine.
Reports have linked continuously regenerating filter
systems to increased emissions of NO2 from
the tailpipe. These do not always contain sufficient
information to enable the reader to make an informed
judgement on the issues.
Some key points are therefore set out below:
- NO2 produced on the catalyst is the
key component used to burn the soot collected in
the filter, and so passive filter systems using
platinum group metals can lead to an increase in
tailpipe NO2 over engine-out
- The amount of excess NO2 produced varies
greatly according to factors such as the actual
amount of particulate and NOx produced by each engine
as well as the driving pattern of the vehicle and
is therefore difficult to design out by optimising
the filter system
- Continuously regenerating filter systems do not
increase total NOx but change the balance
of NO to NO2 at the tailpipe. NO reacts
more slowly in the atmosphere to form NO2
in any case so direct NO2 (that emitted
from the tailpipe) mostly affects air quality close
to busy roads
- All of the NO emitted by an engine would ultimately
be converted to NO2 in the atmosphere,
irrespective of the presence of aftertreatment systems
- The health benefits from reduced PM emissions
(plus HC and CO) are widely considered to greatly
outweigh any disadvantage from increased NO2
formation. The World Health Organisation* and California
Air Resources Board** amongst others have published
the statements below about the health impacts of
the two emissions
- More than 120,000 CRT® systems have brought
significant air quality improvement in many cities
around the world, and will continue to do so
- Direct NO2 emissions from these catalysed
filter systems are only part of picture - NO2
formation in the atmosphere and from other sources
needs to be considered
* NO2 - "The few long-term studies
have not shown evidence for association between NO2
and mortality."
PM - "Studies have suggested that life expectancy
is decreased by long-term exposure to PM. This is
supported by new analyses of time-series studies that
have shown death being advanced by periods of at least
a few months, for causes of death such as cardiovascular
and chronic pulmonary disease."
** ”While it is not possible to conduct a quantitative
risk assessment evaluating NO2 increases
against DPM reductions, DPM-related health effects
are generally considered more severe, leading to nearly
2,000 deaths in California at population-weighted
exposure of 1.8 µg/m³ estimated for the
year 2000, as well as significant morbidity effects
(Lloyd and Cackette, 2001).”
Solutions - Regulatory
- The California Air Resources Board (CARB) recognises
the importance of reducing PM, and the fact that
CRT® systems are highly effective
in achieving this. It has therefore introduced regulations
to limit the increase in NO2 emissions
from filter systems from 2007, and to ensure that
California will continue to benefit from the use
of CRT® technology. Johnson Matthey’s
systems will comply with these new limits
- Some countries, for instance within the EU, have
adopted limits for atmospheric NO2 levels
that will be difficult to meet in some areas due
to primary NO2 emissions as well as atmospheric
effects
- It would be beneficial to introduce schemes that
mandate or incentivise both PM and NOx
reduction retrofit technologies
- Retrofit technology is already available that
will enable vehicles to meet the latest emissions
limits for original equipment
Solutions – Technology
- Optimised CRT® systems that limit
NO2 increases as a percentage of total
NOx
- Retrofit SCRT®
technology to reduce total NOx and PM
emissions
|